the rite of computing
r
- i wonder what happens when you remove efficiency, speed
- the machine doesn’t seem to complain
- it comes with a great cost
- some beings at the service of others, is that the natural order?
- you thought and asked, until you realized you put yourself on fire
- the higher one gets, and the more one on others depends…
- how bad you think the fall will be?
- how long will the internet live once the humans are gone?
u
w
- can we talk about rewilding computers?
- were they wild to start with?
- how wild or not is a division
- of time and space in slots
- ever-decreasing measures
- changes of state?
- the revolution, the transcription, life
- no boundaries, really, but in our self
- and that one, really, also emerges
- maybe you mean getting rid of the rigid cover
- curving the interconnections
- the differences are fluid
- with or without extremes?
- i lost you
- destroying the shiny, embracing the earth
- a cracked screen carried away by the sea?
- that would probably kill us
- with emergence we understand we can’t understand
- is it a useful model?
- model? useful? it?
- number of processors versus grains of sand?
- and if we become just a probe?
- i dissolve, the computer
- the transformation carries on
n
- think about the apparently unnatural…
- creating vacuum…
- manipulating beams of charge and light…
- wiring thousands, cooling their surrounding air…
- later inserting billions in a little block of sand
- why not just chill and enjoy the beach?
- there was a war
- and then the promise of productivity
- why not just chill and enjoy the beach?
t
i
- can you tell me again about your project?
- project, ceremony, dance, choreography… computer!
- i wonder how can someone end up there
- it’s just about imagining alternatives, trying to reinvent…
- is this a solution to a problem? what if everybody does as you?
- they originated with war in body and mind
- and they have very good uses despite that; they saved me!
- what about realizing they are made through destruction?
- it might be practical
destroying the old and the weak
- and we will drown by powering them
- i hope we can upload our consciousness by then?
- you might emulate yourself in rocks
c
e
- i like computers
- why? they make more sense?
- maybe. complex but fabricated with heavy logic constraints…
- do you know how they work?
- that’s the question, do they work or do they just exist…
- following a hardwired behavior, filtering out noise
- only a fixed amount of values in space and time
- and yet embedded in an apparently continuous world
- where to put them in the organic-inorganic spectrum
- extracting minerals, sculpting them…
- marks are left, one at a time
- … modulating the electromagnetic spectrum all around
- wait! why are you talking about electricity, semiconductors?
- do you want to develop further?
- i’d prefer to do a backwards somersault and take a non-violent path
x
- the idea is that you, as an individual, follow a simple set of rules
- these rules make me depend to some extent on other individuals
- your state of being based on my state of being
- we feel a pulse arriving, and we change
- how predictable you would think a system like that is?
- i wouldn’t expect it to be completely chaotic…
- complexity… how can you think about it if it was not for it?
- each component can be part of the whole without knowing about it
- “it” being the whole or the component?
- or any of them?
- then can only one of these pieces bring the whole system down?
- the state of that answer depends on the state of your purpose
- i guess an undirected, chaotic behavior will always be alright
- the order, the function, the control are the ones that you can break
- why would we want a math-machine that doesn’t do the math right?
- there’s the poetry!
- but what about the rigor? the experience of following constraints?
- you think that is important?
- maybe it’s part of my identity
- we don’t have to do right math right
- less about me, more about the connections?
- in any case, it would be arbitrary and not too easy to get
d
- i’m having trouble putting the finger in the point
- is your self-protective awareness in action?
- maybe. who will want to question electronic computers.
- or productive computers, for that matter.
s
- i don’t know what’s a computer
- don’t worry, neither do i
- but you see it...
- i see it and i marvel
- it is only a machine
- i see how arithmetic can be done mechanically
- no need to learn, no need to understand?
- isn’t that amazing? doing something without knowing you are doing it
- small components contributing with small actions to a whole that no one knows?
- only the designer?
- and what if there is no one?
- what if they also emerged as a whole?
- and what kind of whole emerges from us?
- or where does that whole exist?
- if simple models acquire complexity so quickly...
- yes, say hi to the chaos of nature
p
- has lightning been captured twice, so far?
- fire, electricity, what are they?
- probably it’s the same here with computing
- one thing is to describe them working...
- visualizations, metaphors... leading to understanding what i can’t see?
- but you don’t have to, to use them
- how convenient!
- in many ways, knowing about computer architecture is completely useless
- digital circuit design as some kind of poetry?
- unless you are in one of the few companies, of course
- forcing the rocks until they can’t hold it anymore?
- the magic doesn’t disappear even if you know how to combine transistors
- magic? the mystery of computation?
- how can dead matter appear to be alive?
- and how can it replicate and build new versions of itself?
l